Talk:Mechanics: Difference between revisions
StrangeThing (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Proposed Redesign |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
'''Igor''': Macro and micro concepts have no place in a mechanics page, they should be in the strategy one. The Dota 2 wiki has an excellent mechanics page that could be used as reference https://liquipedia.net/dota2/Mechanics | '''Igor''': Macro and micro concepts have no place in a mechanics page, they should be in the strategy one. The Dota 2 wiki has an excellent mechanics page that could be used as reference https://liquipedia.net/dota2/Mechanics | ||
I agree with Igor. --[[User:StrangeThing|StrangeThing]] ([[User talk:StrangeThing|talk]]) 19:10, 5 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Proposed Redesign == | |||
It's mostly links to other pages, that go in depth on specifics. | |||
[[stats]] | |||
[[level]], [[ammo]], [[health]], [[Damage Shield]], [[Damage Resistance]], [[spirit power]], [[stamina]] | |||
[[Status Effects]] | |||
[[map]], [[ziplines]] | |||
[[souls]], [[items]], [[shop]] |
Revision as of 01:31, 15 September 2024
FakerofDeadlock: Will have to add out-of-site hyperlinks to the first mention of macros and micros, probably to Wikipedia.
Shatangmi: I think that the more strategy-related topics like uptime and team composition should be moved to the strategy page. The mechanics page should include "objective" (for lack of a better word) information that is explicitly included in the game. Like stats, map timings, souls, etc. I'm just concerned that the more strategy-related topics could be seen as subjective or debatable.
Igor: Macro and micro concepts have no place in a mechanics page, they should be in the strategy one. The Dota 2 wiki has an excellent mechanics page that could be used as reference https://liquipedia.net/dota2/Mechanics
I agree with Igor. --StrangeThing (talk) 19:10, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Proposed Redesign
It's mostly links to other pages, that go in depth on specifics.
level, ammo, health, Damage Shield, Damage Resistance, spirit power, stamina